Skip to main content

About

9 Lincoln’s Court Chambers was established in 2018 as a modern and forward-looking set focussing on criminal, fraud, and regulatory law.

We provide the highest quality of advocacy and legal services to help individuals, companies, and organisations reach the best possible outcome.

Given our ability to act quickly and at short notice, we are often consulted, either directly or through solicitors, to develop the best strategic position in preparation for criminal proceedings. Often this early advice and representation can result in litigation being avoided.

Since being formed, 9LC have been instructed in most serious cases to come before the criminal courts. We are aware the impact an allegation, criminal investigation, or trial can have, not just on the individual, but also their families, friends, and their work. It is for that reason that whilst we take our work very seriously, we remain friendly, approachable, and sensitive to our client’s needs.

Our ultimate aim is to always work hard for our clients, help navigate them through the Criminal Justice System, and provide excellent service.

WHO WE ARE

Legal Services Provided

Legal services most commonly provided by 9 Lincoln’s Court Chambers are advisory and advocacy services. The areas of practice in which 9 Lincoln’s Court Chambers most commonly provides legal services are:
1

Criminal Defence

Criminal law and procedure are complex. We're here to help you through the Criminal Justice System and obtain the best result for you.
2

Fraud and Regulatory Matters

If you are facing a fraud investigation, you need an experienced lawyer you can rely upon. The law relating to fraud covers many offences and you need someone with experience in all areas.
3

Direct Access & Litigation

Direct access allows you to go directly to the expert barrister for advice, representation and drafting. Counsel, Mr Irfan Arif works in a dual capacity as a Consultant to a specialist criminal Solicitors firm, in addition to his independent status as a sole practitioner. This means Mr Arif is able to conduct litigation on a legal aid basis whilst also conducting advocacy on an independent basis through 9 Lincoln’s Court Chambers.
Mr Arif is also authorised to conduct litigation as a barrister through his status as a sole practitioner, however, such work can only be carried out on a private paying basis. Costs may be reduced by working this way as it saves some duplication of work in appropriate cases. Please do not hesitate to contact our clerking team if you require advice about Criminal Litigation or Advocacy.
4

Private Prosecutions

Under English law, private individual and organisations have a legal right to bring private prosecution proceedings against a potential defendant. This represents an important safeguard where the State has failed to act in prosecuting allegations of criminal behaviour. 9 Lincoln’s Court can assist you by assessing whether the State has been mistaken in any decisions not prosecute and to advise as to the prospects of a successful prosecution, including any representations required thereof. Should you have a viable case for prosecution, we can assist in the gathering of evidence, commencement of Court proceedings and advocacy services at trial.
5

Confiscation, Proceeds of Crime, Forfeiture

9 Lincoln's Court has an exception reputation for its expertise in this niche area. We have extensive experience in dealing with confiscation proceedings. We can advise you on any third party rights you may have in respect of proceedings faced by a defendant.
We advise professionals and corporations on their obligations regarding compliance with money laundering provisions.
We are able to draw on both our criminal law expertise and our substantial experience in financial regulatory matters to provide appropriate and effective advice and representation in all of these circumstances.

Current Instructions

R v DK (Kingston CC) Junior Alone. Allegation of rape in domestic context over 22 years. Trial in October 2022

R v AR & Others (Leicester CC) Junior Alone – 12 defendants charged with drugs conspiracy. Trial in October 2022.

R v MB & others (Wolverhampton CC) Junior Alone. 13 defendants split in two trials. Violent disorder & affray. Trial in October 2022

London Borough of Ealing v NSS (Isleworth CC) – Contesting POCA proceedings in amount of approx. £5million. Final Hearing November 2022

R v LL & Others (Isleworth CC) Junior Alone – 6 handed VAT fraud. Trial in November 2022

R v SB & others (Harrow CC) Junior Alone for first defendant. Kidnap, false imprisonment, and use of machetes to commit robbery. Trial in December 2022

R v CSJ & Others (Inner London CC) Junior Alone in 9-handed case. Money laundering. Trial in Jan 2023

R v KS & others (Wood Green CC) Junior Alone for first defendant. Care home abuse. Trial in March 2023

R v PC & others (Wood Green CC) Junior Alone for the first defendant. Royal Mail fraud. Trial in April 2023

R v IR & others (Southwark CC) Junior Alone. GBH and violence against homeowners in Marylebone. Trial in August 2023

R v TM (Isleworth CC) Junior Alone. Historical sexual abuse allegations from 40 years. Trial in September 2023

R v MB & others (Snaresbrook CC) Junior Alone. Firearms and drugs. Trial in October 2023

Previous Notable Cases

R v SK & others (Isleworth CC) – Junior Alone for the first defendant. SK charged with conspiracy to facilitate illegal immigration. Cut-throat defence run by SK. Case involved complex legal arguments on expert psychiatric evidence, hearsay and bad character. Over 10,000 pages of telephone evidence served. Trial halted shortly before closing speeches due to Judge’s ill-health. Re-trial in January 2024.

R v DS (Kingston CC) – Junior Alone. DS charged with GBH, caused by attacking the victim with an axe. Prosecution relied on two eyewitnesses. After legal argument, prosecution offered no evidence on first day of trial.

R v MJR (Snaresbrook CC) – Junior Alone. MJR was one of 21 defendants split in to 5 separate trials, all charged with various drugs offences involving county lines drug supply. MJR placed within trial 4. On the second day of his trial, after legal arguments in court and discussions with the prosecution, no evidence was offered against him. MJR was only 2 out of the 21 defendants that had no evidence offered against them

R v ES & others (Inner London CC) – Junior Alone. ES charged with perverting the course of justice. Allegation being that she was engaged in an extra-marital affair and had knowledge her lover was going to shoot & kill her husband, which she later lied about to police. Significant evidence later uncovered of text messages and calls between ES and her lover talking about the shooting. After 6 days of trial, Irfan successfully negotiated a lesser charge of ‘making a false written statement.’ ES received a suspended sentence.

R v IB & others (Exeter CC) – Junior Alone for the first defendant. IB charged with conspiracy to facilitate the illegal immigration of 8 people into the UK via a small boat. The prosecution placed IB in the leading category and did not accept his basis of plea that he had been instructed by others. Irfan instructed after IB had pleaded guilty and sacked his legal team. After further disclosure sought and going through the voluminous phone evidence, Irfan redrafted the basis of plea. At the Newton Hearing the prosecution agreed the new basis of plea and IB sentenced to a ‘significant’ role and received a sentence lesser than his co-defendants.

R v MB (Southwark CC) – Led Junior. MB, a medical professional, was charged with s.18 GBH of transmitting HIV to his partner. Legally and medically complex. Only second prosecution in UK of HIV transfer with intent. Irfan instructed to prepare instruction to HIV expert, conduct research on legal argument to dismiss the s.18 charge, and drafted the defence statement. The prosecution eventually offered no evidence against MB 5 days in to trial. Irfan was led by Sarah Forshaw KC.

R v HA (Aylesbury CC) – Junior Alone. HA charged with a number of serious sexual offences. After taking detailed instructions relating to HA’s upbringing and background and undiagnosed learning difficulties, Irfan identified the need for a forensic psychiatrist with a speciality of dealing with sexual offences. Irfan successfully persuaded the sentencing judge to adopt an exceptional course. HA received suspended sentences for all offences.

R v DR & others (Reading CC) – Led Junior. DR and 4 others charged with murder. Case complicated by the fact all 5 defendants were related to deceased. DR was the nephew. Further complication was the pathologist who could not identify cause of death. Irfan conducted all written and oral advocacy until 2 weeks before trial when the Judge granted leading counsel certificate and Sam Robinson KC joined the defence team. 4 days into trial, Sam & Irfan successfully negotiated with the prosecution and reduced the murder charge for DR to one of violent disorder.

R v EK & others (Cardiff CC) – Junior Alone for first defendant. EK charged with cultivation of cannabis on a farm in Wales. After careful consideration of the evidence, including phone and cell site, Irfan persuaded the prosecution to accept a guilty plea on the limited basis of EK being a gardener. EK released from prison at sentence hearing, having been sentenced to time served.

R v KW & others (Wood Green CC) – Junior Alone. KW, and three of his family members charged with modern slavery offences of holding a polish woman in a garden shed for around 6 years. Case involved developing case law as to what amounts to servitude. KW received lowest sentence.

R v NA & others (Snaresbrook CC) – Junior Alone for the first defendant. NA charged with PWITS class A, kidnap, and violent offences. There were significant number of legal arguments and trial eventually stopped after 4 days because of disclosure issues. Trial was relisted for a few weeks later, however before re-trial the Crown offered no evidence against NA based on addendum defence statement written submissions made by Irfan.

R v PC & others (Bournemouth CC) – Junior Alone for second defendant. PC charged with conspiracy & firearm offences. On first day of trial, disclosure issues raised by all defence team. Trial adjourned until new date. Before re-trial, and after further written submissions, prosecution offered no evidence against all defendants.

R v MS (Luton CC) – Junior Alone. MS raised defence of duress to supplying a significant number of drugs for a well-known drug dealer with whom she was in an intimate relationship. After extensive submissions on medical evidence and a forensic psychiatric examination of client, prosecution offered no evidence.

R v AH (Harrow CC) – Junior Alone for first defendant. AH charged with firearms offences with intent to kill. Using medical evidence, Irfan was able to significantly reduce the final sentence and persuaded HHJ to avoid a dangerousness assessment.

R v MM & others (Reading CC) – Junior Alone. MM charged with cultivation of cannabis in various property in and around London. IA successful resisted the prosecution introducing evidence into the case which had not be served formally. The prosecution accepted MM role as Gardner. At the sentence hearing he was sentenced to time served.

R v FD (Inner London CC) – Junior Alone – obtained a suspended sentence for PWITS of class A after negotiating and drafting acceptable basis of plea. Staring point would not have allowed a suspended sentence otherwise.

R v PH (Reading CC) – Junior Alone – PH charged with production of large-scale cannabis. Complicated by fact the growth was on The Royal Estate near Windsor Castle which caused issues of disclosure on evidence. PH also vulnerable with significant mental health issues. Pleaded guilty. Persuaded HHJ to suspend custodial sentence, despite the starting point being over two years.

R v HC (Isleworth CC) HC charged with significant PWITS class A and Criminal Property. He had extensive previous convictions of similar nature. Drafted and argued basis of plea, which was eventually accepted by Crown. Sentenced to significantly lower than the starting point.

Contact

Please do not hesitate to contact us if we can be of assistance.

9 Lincoln’s Court Chambers
St Mary’s Court,
The Broadway,
Amersham,
Buckinghamshire, HP7 0UT

DX: 50706 Amersham
Tel: +44 (0) 1494 590 500
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.9lc.co.uk

9 Lincoln’s Court Chambers is the trading name of M-I Arif Ltd. Company No. 10047977 VAT No. 397 0390 68 Registered in England & Wales: 3 Bevan Hill, Chesham, HP5 2QS, England An Authorised Entity Regulated by the Bar Standards Board BSB Entity Reference Number 168904